ABSTRACT This review article analyzes two pertinent and related works by Marcel Dirsus, How Tyrants Fall, and Hal Brands, The Eurasian Century, to investigate how contemporary authoritarian governments utilize technology to portray an image of stability while obscuring internal vulnerabilities. Dirsus analyzes the inherent mechanisms of autocratic failure, highlighting elite fragmentation and the illusory characteristics of algorithmic governance. Brands expands the perspective to examine how digital authoritarianism transforms global geopolitics, especially throughout the Eurasian landmass. The works collectively demonstrate how technological instruments augment domestic oppression and global power, while simultaneously revealing new weaknesses for regimes. The essay argues that although surveillance and digital manipulation offer temporary control, they ultimately compromise adaptability and legitimacy over time. The perception of technological omnipotence may ultimately catalyze the decline of authoritarianism.
Shabbir et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: