While creative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools offer unprecedented creative power, their outputs often create a “personalization gap” by converging towards a generalized “average aesthetic” that ignores nuanced user preferences. This study addresses this challenge with a proof-of-concept computational framework to model and predict subjective color choices, aiming to make creative systems more human-centered. Our dual-track methodology attempts to decouple user preference into “inherent aesthetic profiles” and “contextual design decisions.” Through a dual-level study with 111 participants, we quantified inherent aesthetics into a vector library and trained a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model on contextual data to predict design choices. The model achieved a predictive accuracy of 40.8%, and a grouped permutation importance analysis revealed the Product Category (Importance = 0.416) as the dominant predictor, providing evidence that design context is paramount. Crucially, a subsequent exploratory user validation study, analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model, showed our personalized recommendations were rated as significantly more satisfying (β = 1.278, p < 0.001) than those of a non-personalized baseline. This research provides a foundational framework for modeling subjective preference by distinguishing between stable traits and dynamic choices, offering a potential pathway to steer creative AI beyond generic outputs towards more personal and context-aware creative partners.
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.