This article proposes a strategic framework for Kyiv’s post-conflict sustainability and resilience under brittle, anxious, non-linear, and incomprehensible (BANI) conditions. We integrate adaptive governance, circular-economy reconstruction, and city-scale digital capabilities, including AI-enabled analytics, IoT sensing, and urban digital twins. Building on recent assessments of Ukraine’s reconstruction needs, we outline a socio-technical model that links sustainability and resilience objectives under shock risk and budget constraints and show how an illustrative five-year optimisation can rebalance investments toward distributed renewables and early-warning infrastructure. The example portfolio achieves an end-horizon composite performance of Foptimized(5) = 0.65 (on a 0–1 normalised index where 1 indicates achieving the policy-defined targets; 0.65 indicates ~65% progress toward those targets at year 5, improving on the baseline allocation under shocks), indicating improved robustness relative to a baseline allocation. We emphasise that effective implementation depends on secure-by-design digital architecture, participatory prioritisation of indicators and weights, and iterative monitoring that supports rapid adaptation as conditions evolve. The framework provides a pragmatic roadmap for Kyiv and similarly vulnerable cities seeking a low-carbon recovery while reducing systemic brittleness and mitigating anxiety-driven decision-making delays.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sergiy Bushuyev
Carsten Wolff
Іhor Biletskyi
Urban Science
Dortmund University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bushuyev et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6984359ef1d9ada3c1fb496f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10020091
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: