What this record isThis Zenodo record provides the v3.2.0 preprint “Residual Λeff in a Gauged Constant Vacuum-Mode (GCV) Framework: A ‘Squashing-Remnant’ Interpretation” and its accompanying files. Scope and intentOn the GR-exact branch of GCV, late-time cosmology is exactly GR with a constant, flux-fixed integration constant Λeff once Λeff is fixed by data. This note sharpens the interpretation of the observed tiny positive Λeff as a residual “squashing remnant” of global constant-mode neutralisation, rather than as a dynamical dark-energy component. What’s new in v3.2.0 UV-anchored tightening: a companion semi-explicit UV existence-proof / parameter-mapping package provides an explicit anchor for (i) the interpretation of Λeff as a flux-fixed integration constant distinct from absolute UV vacuum offsets, (ii) a “red-line” operator rule forcing the leading portal to be vacuum-subtracted and dimension-8, and (iii) a normalisation closure tying ⟨F4²⟩/M⋆⁴ to an integer lattice norm in an explicit two-flux benchmark. Sign of the remnant: this note now cites a minimal late-time viability “selection layer” analysis showing that basic structure + recollapse constraints can bias a dense near-zero discretuum toward Λeff > 0 by an O(few) factor, without modifying the GR-exact backbone. Survey-facing predictions: adds a compact “what can/cannot mimic dark energy in minimal GCV” summary and a growth-tilt target for full-shape analyses. What’s included Manuscript (PDF) checksum/manifest file for integrity checking Recommended citationJohansson, G. (2026). Residual Λeff in a Gauged Constant Vacuum-Mode (GCV) Framework: A “Squashing-Remnant” Interpretation (v3.2.0). Zenodo. Concept DOI (all versions): 10.5281/zenodo.17707787. Project homepagehttps://johansson.digital
Germund Johansson (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: