This research project proposes the development and formalization of a non-anthropocentric, coherence-based analytical model aimed at evaluating non-decodable interaction phenomena. Such phenomena are characterized by their resistance to traditional interpretative approaches grounded in intentionality, meaning, semantic communication, or the centrality of the human observer, and are often addressed through conceptually heterogeneous and methodologically underdefined frameworks. The primary purpose of the study is not to explain, validate, or empirically interpret these phenomena, but to establish an explicit formal framework that allows their internal structure, systemic consistency, and conditions of applicability to be evaluated without recourse to anthropocentric assumptions. The proposed model defines clear analytical criteria, logical decision rules, and boundary conditions that enable documented cases to be classified as compatible, non-compatible, or non-applicable to the framework. The research is based exclusively on the systematic application of the framework to pre-existing phenomena, documented cases, and literature. No new empirical data are generated, and no statistical models, probabilistic inference, or quantitative measurements are employed. The value of the work lies in the explicit specification of a reproducible analytical operator and in the clear delineation of its conceptual scope and limits. Expected outcomes include (1) demonstrating the applicability of the model across different types of non-decodable interaction phenomena, (2) explicitly identifying the conceptual boundaries of the coherence-based approach, and (3) providing a methodologically distinguishable alternative to prevailing anthropocentric or interpretative frameworks. This project is presented as a theoretical and methodological contribution, open to critical evaluation, refutation, and future developments through appropriately registered extensions.
Hugo marcelo Perez (Thu,) studied this question.