Systematic intracoronary assessment with adenosine and acetylcholine in 1001 patients with suspected ANOCA identified eight distinct hemodynamic endotypes, with 23% showing normal responses.
Cohort
Yes
Does systematic intracoronary physiological testing with adenosine and acetylcholine identify distinct hemodynamic endotypes in patients with suspected ANOCA?
1001 patients with suspected angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), mean age 62±11 years, 56% female, enrolled across 9 centers in Europe and North America.
Systematic assessment of hemodynamic endotypes measuring coronary flow reserve and resistance using an intracoronary pressure- and temperature-sensitive sensor and bolus thermodilution, at rest and following intracoronary infusion of adenosine and acetylcholine.
Identification of distinct hemodynamic endotypes based on symptomatic, electrocardiographic, and hemodynamic responses to adenosine and acetylcholine.surrogate
Comprehensive intracoronary physiological testing in patients with ANOCA successfully identifies distinct hemodynamic endotypes, which can guide targeted, mechanism-specific medical therapy.
Abstract Background Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is a prevalent myocardial ischemic syndrome. Mechanisms of ischemia are challenging to assess and medical therapy is empirical. Methods Patients with suspected ANOCA were prospectively enrolled in nine centers in Europe and North America. Hemodynamic endotypes were assessed measuring coronary flow reserve and resistance using an intracoronary pressure- and temperature-sensitive sensor and bolus thermodilution. Measurements were obtained during resting conditions and following intracoronary infusion of adenosine and acetylcholine. Chest pain and electrocardiographic ischemic changes were also recorded. The participant characteristics associated with each hemodynamic endotype were investigated using regression analysis. A three-step Delphi consensus method to identify endotype-specific therapies was completed by thirteen invasive cardiologists. Results 1001 participants (mean age 62±11years, 56% female) were enrolled and eight distinct endotypes were defined by adenosine testing (n=3) and acetylcholine testing (n=5), respectively: elevated resting coronary blood flow, n=195 (19%); impaired endothelium-independent vasodilation, n=125 (13%); compensated endothelium-independent dysfunction, n=112 (11%); epicardial coronary spasm, n=162(17%); microvascular spasm, n=75 (8%); endothelial dysfunction, n=96 (10%); ischemia w/o hemodynamic changes (microvascular steal), n=68 (7%); and enhanced cardiac nociception, n=79 (8%). More than one endotype occurred in 186(19%) individuals and normal responses occurred in 234 (23%) individuals. Each endotype was associated with distinct clinical correlates. The Delphi clinician consensus (100% "agree" or "strongly agree") identified endotype-specific medical therapy with a Likert scale score ≥6 for all endotypes. Conclusion In patients with suspected ANOCA a systematic assessment of the symptomatic, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to adenosine and acetylcholine identifies distinct endotypes and enables mechanism-guided stratified angina therapy.Summary of Endotypes Heat Map of Endotypes and risk factors
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ornela Velollari
S Miner
H M Renteira
European Heart Journal
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
University of Ferrara
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Velollari et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) (n=1,001). Intracoronary physiological assessment (adenosine and acetylcholine) was evaluated on Hemodynamic endotypes. Systematic intracoronary assessment with adenosine and acetylcholine in 1001 patients with suspected ANOCA identified eight distinct hemodynamic endotypes, with 23% showing normal responses.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698585ea8f7c464f23009a8a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1580