LVA ablation plus PVI significantly reduced AF/AT recurrence from 50.9% to 31.3% in patients with extensive LVAs (>20 cm²) in the SUPPRESS-AF trial.
Does low-voltage area ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation reduce AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left atrial LVAs ≥5 cm²?
344 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) covering ≥5 cm² of the left atrial surface.
Low-voltage area ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI+LVA-ABL)
Pulmonary vein isolation alone (PVI-alone)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate during 1-year follow-upcomposite
Low-voltage area ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation significantly reduces arrhythmia recurrence specifically in persistent AF patients with extensive left atrial LVAs (>20 cm²).
Abstract Background A larger low-voltage area (LVA) in the left atrium is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Therefore, the efficacy of LVA ablation may differ depending on LVA size. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the impact of LVA size on the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF patients and left atrial LVAs. Methods An analysis was performed using data from the SUPPRESS-AF trial, a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs. LVAs were defined as areas with a bipolar peak-to-peak voltage of 0.5mV, and patients with LVAs covered ≥5 cm² of the left atrial surface were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo LVA ablation (PVI+LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate and treatment effect during 1-year follow-up were examined according to the LVA size categories: small LVA (5-10 cm², n=116), moderate LVA (10-20cm², n=121), and extensive LVA (20 cm², n=107). Results The median LVA was 13.4 cm² (interquartile range, 8.7-23.3). The overall incidence of AF/AT recurrence did not significantly differ between the PVI+LVA-ABL and PVI-alone groups (36.3% vs. 41.5%, log-rank p=0.31). Similar results were observed in patients with small LVAs (34.0% vs. 29.3%, log-rank p=0.53) and moderate LVAs (44.4% vs. 41.8%, log-rank p=0.68). However, in patients with extensive LVAs, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the PVI+LVA-ABL group than PVI-alone group (31.3% vs. 50.9%, log-rank p=0.038). When stratified in 1cm² increments, the treatment effect differed across LVA sizes, with the most significant interaction observed at an LVA of 17 cm² (interaction p=0.023). Conclusions The efficacy of LVA ablation in addition to PVI differed according to left atrial LVA sizes. Treatment benefit was obtained in patients with extensive LVAs in the SUPPRESS-AF trial.Kapalan-Meier curves Hazard ratio across LVA spectrum
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M Okada
Daisuke Sakamoto
M Masuda
European Heart Journal
The University of Osaka
Qingdao University
Nara Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Okada et al. (Sat,) reported a other. LVA ablation plus PVI significantly reduced AF/AT recurrence from 50.9% to 31.3% in patients with extensive LVAs (>20 cm²) in the SUPPRESS-AF trial.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698827c90fc35cd7a8846c40 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.462