This study diagnoses that while modern civilization has secured high-level control over physical reality (Is), the public sphere has degenerated into a hyper-conflict society—an exclusive ‘Arena of Passions.’ This paper traces the epistemological origin of this lag to the linguistic turn of modern philosophy, which prioritized discourse interpretation over physical reality, leading to a loss of reality. This study elucidates how the innate ‘Will to Solidarity (Layer 1)’ combines with academic, technological, and financial infrastructure to reinforce itself into a ‘Structured Solidarity (Layer 2).’ Specifically, this study analyzes the ‘Moralized Critical Framework (MCF)’ not as a mere ideological entity, but as a symptomatic case demonstrating how Layer 1 passions are solidified into a Layer 2 system. The essence of the problem lies not in ideology, but in the fundamental mechanism of Layer 1 that drives such unfalsifiable epistemological monopolies. Accordingly, this paper rejects Kantian dualism and attempts a fundamental ontological shift reducing moral ought to physical causality. Using Spinoza’s geometrical methodology to deconstruct free will, it derives five ontological premises and four key variables quantifying conatus: Negentropy Efficiency (η), Information Complexity (I), Causal Work (W), and the Coefficient of Adequacy (A). These constitute a new socio-engineering system replacing normative ethics, presenting a concrete vision of the future. Conclusively, this study proposes an AI architecture, ‘The Mirror of Reason.’ It addresses value alignment not through moral learning, but by designing a causal simulator. By establishing an external rational system to correct biased cognition, this research provides the foundation to transform wasteful struggles into an epistemological truce and evolutionary solidarity.
Kyunghoe Kim (Thu,) studied this question.