ABSTRACT Background Prolonged emergency department waiting times are associated with increased mortality among older patients. In January 2025, the ED of Linkoping University Hospital, Sweden, implemented a low‐resource routine to expedite the workup of older patients living with frailty by prioritized physician assessment and subsequent workup. Aim To investigate if a frailty alert using the Clinical Frailty Scale followed by prioritized clinical assessment influences ED operating metrics. Design This was an observational before and after study of a pre‐implementation group (control) and a post‐implementation group (intervention) between October 2024 and February 2025. Setting/Participants Consecutive patients aged > 64 years, with a documented CFS assessment during the ED visit at the Linkoping University Hospital, Sweden, who consented to participation, were included. Method Standard ED operating metrics, Time to physician , ED length of stay (LOS), and admission rates were compared between a pre‐implementation group and a post‐implementation group. Results A total of 542 ED visits were analyzed (248 pre‐implementation, 294 post‐implementation). Time to physician was shorter in the post‐implementation group at 31 min (IQR 15, 65) versus 44 min (IQR 20, 94) ( p < 0.001). ED LOS was reduced from 352 (IQR 266, 515) to 319 (IQR 240, 458) minutes ( p = 0.014). The admission rate was unchanged at 59% and 60% ( p = 0.4). Conclusion Frailty alerts based on the CFS with prioritized workup reduced ED LOS and time to physician in older patients living with frailty in this single center study and may be a low‐resource intervention to reduce the risks of adverse events in the ED. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06869148
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samia Munir Ehrlington
Jens Wretborn
Daniel Wilhelms
Academic Emergency Medicine
Linköping University
Linköping University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ehrlington et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698828cb0fc35cd7a8848842 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70239
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: