This preprint presents a conceptual analysis of why widely adopted project management methodologies often fail to deliver expected outcomes in practice. While formal frameworks and standardized approaches are intended to improve control and predictability, many projects continue to experience delays, cost overruns, and performance challenges. The paper argues that such failures are not primarily due to methodological shortcomings, but rather to the managerial, organizational, and contextual conditions under which these methodologies are applied. Adopting a managerial perspective, the study identifies four interrelated dimensions that limit the practical effectiveness of project management methodologies: organizational constraints, behavioral and cognitive factors, contextual misalignment, and managerial overreliance on formal frameworks. The paper emphasizes the gap between methodological assumptions and real-world organizational dynamics, highlighting how rigid adherence to standardized practices can undermine project performance. The paper further proposes a set of adaptive managerial principles that position project management methodologies as flexible tools rather than prescriptive solutions. By emphasizing managerial judgment, contextual awareness, and continuous sense-making, the study offers practical insights for managers seeking to improve project outcomes in complex organizational environments. This work contributes to ongoing discussions on the theory–practice gap in project management and provides a foundation for future empirical research.
Shaileja kuthuru (Thu,) studied this question.