Digital–intelligent integration (DII) has emerged as a pivotal driver for high-quality urban development, offering a pathway to overcome pressing resource and environmental constraints. By harnessing data as a core production factor and integrating advanced intelligent technologies, DII can substantially elevate urban green economic efficiency (GEE). This study constructs a quasi-natural experiment using the staggered rollout of national big data comprehensive pilot zones (initiated in 2012) and smart-city pilot programs (from 2016 onward). Employing a rigorous staggered difference-in-differences (DID) estimator on panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities over 2010–2021, we find that DII causally increases GEE by 5.03 percentage points (p < 0.01). This benchmark result remains robust across a comprehensive set of checks, including parallel-trend validation, placebo tests, double/debiased machine learning, two-stage least squares with historical IT-sector instruments, and controls for overlapping policies (e.g., ETS, low-carbon pilots, green finance zones). Mechanism analysis, conducted via a sequential 2SLS control-function approach with lagged mediators and Sobel–Goodman mediation tests, reveals three theoretically grounded channels: (i) enhanced urban ecological resilience (mediates 62%, z = 4.68), (ii) accelerated green technological innovation (55%, z = 4.12, measured by IPC/Y02 patent share), and (iii) heightened entrepreneurial vitality (58%, z = 4.39, new firms per 10,000 residents). Heterogeneity tests show pronounced effects in growing and mature resource-based cities (+1.21% and +11.21%), high-fintech cities (+11.35%), and high-river-density areas (+10.29%) but insignificant impacts in declining resource-exhausted cities (joint F p = 0.08). This study makes four key contributions: (1) it innovatively constructs a continuous DII policy variable by exploiting the synergistic timing of dual pilots, thereby overcoming the limitation of analyzing policies in isolation; (2) it opens the “theoretical black box” by integrating institutional theory and information economics into a unified conceptual framework that explicitly links DII to GEE through reduced transaction costs and alleviated information asymmetry; (3) it enriches the mediation identification strategy in staggered settings using 2SLS control functions and sequential G-estimation, addressing endogeneity in intermediary variables more rigorously than traditional three-step approaches; and (4) it delivers nuanced evidence on the contextual conditions (when and where) under which DII yields the strongest green dividends, providing actionable guidance for China’s “dual-carbon” goals and the global green transition.
He et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: