Root computed tomography angiography accurately measured virtual basal ring and geometric height with ICCs up to 0.98, aiding surgical planning in 238 patients.
Does root computed tomography angiography accurately measure virtual basal ring and geometric height compared to intraoperative measurements in patients eligible for aortic valve repair?
238 patients with good quality image data potentially eligible for aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement
Root computed tomography angiography (CT) measurements of virtual basal ring and geometric height
Intraoperative measurements and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Accuracy and consistency of virtual basal ring and geometric height measurements (evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Bland-Altman method)surrogate
Root computed tomography angiography provides highly accurate measurements of the virtual basal ring and geometric height, comparable to intraoperative measurements, aiding in surgical planning for aortic valve repair.
Abstract Objectives Root computed tomography angiography is a helpful imaging tool for designing aortic valve repair and valve-sparing surgery. It remains unclear whether this method produces reliable measurements in virtual basal ring and geometric height. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy in a large patients’ sample. Methods The virtual basal ring and geometric height were evaluated by computed tomography and intraoperative measurements, with the virtual basal ring additionally assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The consistency was evaluated with the Bland-Altman method. Results A total of 238 patients with good quality image data were included. The virtual basal ring was 26.42(4.23) mm on TTE, 28.83(4.50) mm on root computed tomography angiography, and 28.06(4.00) mm on intraoperatively(ICC: 0.96 versus 0.98). The geometric height of the left tricuspid cusp, left bicuspid cusp in 2 sinuses, and non-fused bicuspid cusp with right non-fusion was 19.28(2.24) mm on computed tomography versus 19.24(2.20) mm intraoperatively (ICC = 0.97). The geometric height of the right tricuspid cusp and the right bicuspid cusp with 2 sinuses was 19.06(2.41) mm vs 19.11(2.50) mm (ICC = 0.97). The geometric height of the non-coronary tricuspid cusp and the non-fused bicuspid cusp with left-right fusion was 20.54(2.63) mm vs 20.84(2.77) mm (ICC = 0.98). Conclusions The virtual basal ring and geometric height can be accurately measured using root computed tomography angiography. For patients potentially eligible for aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement, it may provide important information to plan the surgical strategy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liang Fang
Yue Zheng
Naishi Zhao
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fang et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Root computed tomography angiography accurately measured virtual basal ring and geometric height with ICCs up to 0.98, aiding surgical planning in 238 patients.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c46267fb587c655e8df — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf479
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: