Resonance-matched stimulation and standardized coherence-induction protocols are predicted to yield higher composite multiscale coherence index κΔ than amplitude-matched frequency-offset controls and surrogate null models after multiple comparisons correction.
Healthy adult participants seated or supine in a controlled environment
Resonance-matched stimulation and standardized coherence-induction protocols (e.g., controlled ELF stimulation, acoustic modulation, or proximity to a defined enclosure boundary condition)
Amplitude-matched frequency-offset controls, phase-scrambled stimulation, and sham exposures
Within-subject difference in composite index κ∆ (quantifying simultaneous elevation across physiological, environmental, boundary-condition, and water-adjacent domains) compared to surrogate nullssurrogate
Presents a mechanism-agnostic, falsifiable protocol for testing cross-domain phase coupling between physiological oscillations, environmental electromagnetic variability, and water-adjacent readouts.
Updated from: ∆.72 Coherence Physics, Time as Vibration, Water as Recorder (V1.4). Summary of changes in V1.5: This release refactors the manuscript from a conceptual framing into a preregisterable, falsification-forward methods paper. Language implying broad claims (e.g., “biofield,” “water memory,” and geometry as “amplification”) is replaced with strictly operational definitions and mechanism-agnostic scope. The protocol is strengthened with explicit blinding, sham exposures, contamination and temperature controls for water-adjacent readouts, and matched-control difference-of-differences requirements for enclosure/boundary-condition testing. The analysis plan is tightened via prespecified estimators, surrogate/phase-scrambled null models, primary decision rules, artifact controls (including coil-on baselines), and multiple-comparisons correction. Figures were updated clearer domain mapping.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allison Hensgen
Hokkaido Research Organization
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allison Hensgen (Mon,) conducted a other in Healthy adult participants in controlled environment. Resonance-matched electromagnetic stimulation and standardized coherence-induction protocol vs. Amplitude-matched frequency-offset stimulation and surrogate null models was evaluated on Within-subject difference in composite multiscale coherence index (ΔκΔ) across physiology, environment, boundary condition, and water-adjacent persistence readouts. Resonance-matched stimulation and standardized coherence-induction protocols are predicted to yield higher composite multiscale coherence index κΔ than amplitude-matched frequency-offset controls and surrogate null models after multiple comparisons correction.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c73267fb587c655eff0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18556932