Abstract: This essay argues that understanding the current situation of the aesthetic, about which Fredric Jameson was as right in 1984 as he would be were he to publish the "postmodernism" essay again today, requires scholars to let go of the forms of historiographical expectation and valuation that they have inherited from previous periods. Among the most persistent of these is a generalized modernism, which, this essay argues, characterizes not only the literary critical thinking of those who work in that specific area, but the entire discipline of literary studies itself. Letting go of this inheritance is therefore an important step in, first, a correct understanding of the current situation of the aesthetic, and, second, a broad reformation of the epistemological practices of the critical disciplines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eric Hayot
New Literary History
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eric Hayot (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6dae5be6419ac0d52ba6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2025.a982259
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: