Abstract Background: Erroneously labeled penicillin allergies can lead to prolonged hospitalization, increased adverse effects and infection rates with alternative antibiotics. Although elderly patients are more vulnerable to these negative outcomes, penicillin allergy assessments and de-labeling remain underutilized in this population. Objective: To assess the efficacy and challenges of implementing penicillin allergy de-labeling in hospitalized elderly patients. Methods: Between March 2024 and April 2025, we conducted a quality improvement study on patients who were 65 years and older, had a penicillin allergy, and were admitted to Burnaby Hospital Acute Care for Elderly (ACE) Unit. Patients were proactively screened, interviewed, and assessed for eligibility in allergy de-labeling based on PEN-FAST score ≤1, predefined criteria, clinical judgment, and patient consent. If penicillin challenge was given, patients received pharmacist follow-up and 4-week outcomes were documented. A post-implementation survey was distributed to ward healthcare staff to identify barriers to implementation. Results: Out of 105 patients screened, 87 patients met study inclusion criteria. Among 34 patients deemed eligible for de-labeling, 24 patients (71%) were de-labeled from either oral amoxicillin challenge or information gathering alone. Within four weeks after de-labeling, 10 patients (42%) received beta-lactam antibiotics, and no patients received guideline-discordant broad-spectrum antibiotics. Only 1 patient experienced a delayed reaction to amoxicillin-clavulanate. From surveying ACE unit nursing, physician, and pharmacy staff, frequently reported barriers to allergy assessment and de-labeling included time and staffing constraints, and patient complexity. Conclusions: Our pharmacy-driven interdisciplinary penicillin allergy de-labeling initiative is effective and safe for eligible hospitalized older adults with low PEN-FAST scores (≤1).
Co et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: