A full-dose quadruple single-pill combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol demonstrated superiority over triple therapy for reducing office systolic BP (difference -8 mmHg; P<0.0001).
RCT (n=183)
1:1
Double-blind
Yes
Does a quadruple single-pill combination (perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol) reduce systolic blood pressure compared to continued triple therapy in patients with resistant hypertension?
183 patients with confirmed resistant hypertension (uncontrolled systolic blood pressure after an 8-week run-in period on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine)
Quadruple single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol for 8 weeks
Continued triple therapy (perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine) for 8 weeks
Office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at Week 8surrogate
A quadruple single-pill combination of perindopril, indapamide, amlodipine, and bisoprolol provides superior blood pressure reduction compared to standard triple therapy in patients with resistant hypertension.
Effect estimate: Difference -8 mmHg (95% CI -11.99, -4.09)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Abstract Background and Aims True resistant hypertension leads to higher rates of target-organ damage, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality compared with general hypertension. Guidelines recommend adding a fourth drug to triple therapy if blood pressure (BP) remains uncontrolled. This Phase 3 trial aimed to demonstrate superior BP reduction with the first full-dose quadruple single-pill combination (SPC) vs triple antihypertensive therapy for uncontrolled BP. Methods QUADRO was a multicentre, Phase 3, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial in resistant hypertension. After an 8-week run-in period on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine, participants were randomized 1:1 to quadruple SPC perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol or continued the same triple therapy for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments included office systolic BP (SBP) at Week 8 (primary outcome) and 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The primary analysis examined all randomized patients with uncontrolled SBP; safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered under EudraCT No. 2020-004891-16. Results Overall, 183 patients (quadruple SPC, n = 89; triple therapy, n = 94) were randomized. After 8 weeks, decreases in office SBP −8 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): −11.99, −4.09; P .0001 and 24 h-ABPM (−8 mmHg; 95% CI: −10.95, −4.11; P .0001) were greater with quadruple SPC vs triple therapy. Both treatments were well tolerated; 10 participants (11%) receiving quadruple SPC and 8 (8%) receiving triple therapy had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and no serious or severe TEAEs were reported. Conclusions The first full-dose quadruple antihypertensive SPC (perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol) demonstrated superiority over perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine, offering an effective alternative therapy for confirmed resistant hypertension.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
S Taddei
University of Pisa
K Narkiewicz
Gdańsk Medical University
Stéphanie Bricout-Hennel
Institut des Sciences du Végétal
European Heart Journal
University of Pisa
Gdańsk Medical University
Servier (France)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Taddei et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in resistant hypertension (n=183). quadruple single-pill combination (perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol) vs. triple therapy (perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine) was evaluated on office systolic BP (SBP) at Week 8 (Difference -8 mmHg, 95% CI -11.99, -4.09, p=<0.0001). A full-dose quadruple single-pill combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine/bisoprolol demonstrated superiority over triple therapy for reducing office systolic BP (difference -8 mmHg; P<0.0001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebf3485a1ff6a93016611 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag022
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: