This paper develops a constellational ontology of meaning that moves beyond standard subject–object frameworks in philosophy and the human sciences. It begins by showing how Husserl, Heidegger, and Benjamin each disclose a dimension in which world and self are co‑given yet exceed their correlational articulation: Husserl through the horizonal correlation of profiles and essences, Benjamin through a kabbalistic model of linguistic folds, and Heidegger through an ontology of openness (Lichtung) in which beings stand forth as both within and beyond meaning. Building on these trajectories, the paper reconceives correlation not as a relation between pre‑given poles or levels, but as a reflective–diffractive field that generates its own edges. Empirical and "absolute" dimensions emerge as surplus folds of a shared presencing, mutually disclosing and mutually exceeding one another, so that what appears as "in‑itself" is the diffracted edge of a constellation that cannot fully absorb its own reflection. The second part elaborates this field as an I‑nvironment: a prior space of meaning in which self, others, and world crystallize as differentiated folds. Drawing on examples from daily perception, embodiment, echolocation, blindness, and collaborative dance, the paper argues that we never encounter isolated subjects and objects, but always already inhabit constellations in which things appear within meaningfulness and, at the same time, as outside of it. The final part shifts the analysis from ontology to grammar, showing how modern subject–object syntax stabilizes and hierarchizes constellational presencing by pre‑cutting experience into poles of subject and object, inside and outside. Through cases ranging from Mohawk verb structures to BDSM table‑scenes and the vanishing of "beings that look back", the paper argues that alienation and domination are grounded in grammatical regimes that format how beings can appear at all. A radical phenomenology of grammar is proposed in which self and world are understood as effects of a single, generative field of meaning.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Guy Weinberger
Freie Universität Berlin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Guy Weinberger (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699010f22ccff479cfe57350 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/kar7b-k1t05