This preprint presents a theoretical framework proposing that love functions as an integrative force in conscious systems. In this framework, love is not defined as a transient emotion or romantic attachment, but as a relational condition characterized by perceived safety, attunement, care, responsiveness, and non contingent regard. The central theoretical claim is as follows: A conscious system tends over time toward coherence, health, and stability in the presence of love, and toward fragmentation, distress, and dysfunction in its absence. This claim is directional rather than absolute. It does not assert that love guarantees health, nor that its absence inevitably produces pathology. Rather, it describes a developmental and statistical tendency observable across contexts. A conscious system is defined functionally as any system capable of subjective experience and self regulation, including individual minds and relational dyads. Psychological coherence refers to the degree of integration among affective states, cognitive representations, and behavioral responses. Fragmentation refers to disorganization, conflict among internal processes, and instability in self regulation. Drawing on attachment theory, affect regulation research, and systems psychology, the framework synthesizes established empirical findings under a higher order principle. The theory does not replace existing models but aims to clarify why sustained relational safety and care consistently predict psychological integration across developmental, clinical, and interpersonal domains. The article outlines testable implications, including the prediction that sustained exposure to loving relational conditions should predict increasing integration over time, that chronic absence should predict fragmentation independent of specific diagnostic categories, and that relational repair should restore coherence through the reintroduction of integrative conditions. Limitations, cultural variability, and measurement challenges are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex James Bilodeau
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex James Bilodeau (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b3fb9b75e639e9b08dbe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18636828