Empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality by 20% and serious adverse events by 13%, while sotagliflozin and empagliflozin significantly lowered heart failure hospitalizations.
Does the choice of specific SGLT2 inhibitor differentially reduce mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with heart failure?
80,666 patients with heart failure pooled from 16 RCTs
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) as a class, including empagliflozin, sotagliflozin, and canagliflozin
Placebo (and indirect network comparisons among different SGLT2 inhibitors)
All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization due to HF, and myocardial infarction (MI)hard clinical
In a network meta-analysis of heart failure patients, empagliflozin demonstrated the lowest risk of cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse events, while sotagliflozin showed the greatest reduction in heart failure hospitalizations.
Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown promise in treating heart failure (HF), but the best choice among these drugs remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different SGLT2is in HF patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted up until March 2023. These trials had to compare SGLT2i medications to a placebo in patients with HF. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization due to HF, and myocardial infarction (MI). Furthermore, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model and inverse variance statistics. Results: We included 16 RCTs involving 80 666 patients (43 743 on SGLT2 inhibitors, 36 923 on placebo). No SGLT2 inhibitor demonstrated a significant difference in all-cause mortality and MI compared to others. However, empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality by 20% (RR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93), including in patients with diabetes. All SGLT2 inhibitors lowered the risk of hospitalization for HF compared to placebo, except for canagliflozin. Sotagliflozin had the greatest reduction in hospitalizations (RR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.57–0.76), followed by empagliflozin (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.81). There were no significant differences among SGLT2 inhibitors for stroke or drug discontinuation due to side effects. Notably, empagliflozin had a 13% lower risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76–0.99). Conclusion: Empagliflozin was associated with the lowest risk of both cardiovascular mortality and serious side effects. While all SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the likelihood of hospitalizations for HF, canagliflozin did not show a significant benefit in this area. There were no significant differences between the SGLT2 inhibitors in terms of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or side effects leading to treatment discontinuation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shadi Abuhashem
Mohammed Aramin
Ashraf Mohammed Alhazmi
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
University of Khartoum
University of Tabuk
King Fahd Medical City
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abuhashem et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality by 20% and serious adverse events by 13%, while sotagliflozin and empagliflozin significantly lowered heart failure hospitalizations.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b45f9b75e639e9b09499 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000004669
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: