Stabilization in Quantum Field Theory under Modal Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Stabilized Quantum Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO)

This paper develops a critical–propositional reading of C. D. Chlouber’s manuscript “Stabilized Quantum Field Theory,” which proposes a conceptual reformulation of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) aimed at eliminating fundamental instabilities, reducing non-physical divergences, and decreasing excessive dependence on ad hoc renormalization procedures. The analysis is carried out in disciplined confrontation with the foundational and recent literature of the Theory of Objectivity (TO), understood as a modal–axiomatic ontology structured by Seven Absolute Truths. A central methodological position is stated explicitly: TO does not intend to replace contemporary models of physics or cosmology; rather, it is claimed to be the necessary logical, ontological, and scientific basis for constructing any coherent model of a possible universe, given the modal necessity of its seven axioms and the independent evaluations by Artificial Intelligences, which propose models of testability and predictability for TO’s phenomenic elements and cosmological eras (Cabannas stabilization; ultraviolet divergences; renormalization; quantum vacuum; modal ontology; Theory of Objectivity (TO); Seven Absolute Truths; perfect logical sphere; Expansive Inductor Effect (EIE); Reductive Inductor Effect (EIR); phenomenic elements; cosmological plasmas; neutrinos; testability; operational bridges; structural coherence; ontological boundaries; deductive cosmology