The drive to eliminate friction in digital interfaces raises key questions about how we experience, understand, and learn. When usability prioritizes speed and transparency, the resistance that fosters attention and reflection often disappears. Yet neuroscientific research shows that cognitive effort supports long-term memory and meaningful learning. In education, error—when acknowledged and explored—can become a space of transformation. This article examines friction in three domains: video game design, where failure fosters engagement and strategic adaptation; pedagogy, where error sustains critical learning; and neurocognitive processes, where effort activates plasticity and growth. Across these contexts, friction is not an obstacle but a catalyst for deeper experience. Removing resistance from digital systems may enhance immediacy, but at the cost of depth, agency, and learning potential. We propose that intentional friction—carefully embedded in interfaces and learning environments—can restore interpretive autonomy, support cognitive engagement, and enable co-construction of meaning. Rethinking design as negotiation rather than mere facilitation positions resistance as a condition for thought, engagement, and transformation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Agnese Rosati
University of Perugia
Keren Ponzo
University of Vienna
Leonardo Silvagni
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
University of Perugia
American Academy of Religion
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rosati et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699264d1eb1f82dc367a0b72 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v8i20.40175
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: