Multi-outlet air-assisted sprayers are increasingly used for directional and zoned airflow to match varying canopy structures. In this study, a self-developed multi-outlet orchard air-assisted sprayer was investigated. Airflow velocity and direction were tested at different inlet areas, heights, and downstream horizontal distances using a three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometer. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression modeling were applied to elucidate the effects of these three factors on airflow velocity, horizontal angle (θ), and elevation angle (Φ). The results showed that a stable alternating “primary jet–interaction zone” structure was formed in the spatial airflow field under all operating conditions, indicating that the fundamental airflow pattern was mainly governed by the sprayer layout. Varying the inlet area did not alter the basic airflow structure; however, the intensity and directional stability of the primary jets were significantly modified. Larger inlet openings produced higher airflow velocities, with a maximum near-field velocity of 19.7 m s−1, whereas smaller inlet openings resulted in faster far-field attenuation and more pronounced diffusion. Increasing the inlet area caused the θ distribution peak to converge toward 0°, thereby improving axial coherence and directional stability. In contrast, decreasing the inlet area shifted Φ toward more negative values, with Φ reaching approximately −20° in the far field; moreover, far-field differences in Φ were more pronounced. Under the minimum inlet opening area condition (S1), the airflow velocity within the region 80–100 cm from the outlet can be stably maintained above 3 m/s, with a relatively uniform velocity distribution. This is beneficial for improving droplet deposition uniformity within the canopy and reducing droplet drift in non-target areas. Based on the experimental data, a regression model for mean airflow velocity was established (R2 = 0.873), demonstrating good predictive performance and indicating that inlet-opening regulation is feasible. These findings provide a basis for airflow matching and spray-parameter optimization for different canopy structures.
Feng et al. (Sat,) studied this question.