This study examines the dynamics of labour migration and its impact on economic transformation within the post-Soviet space, particularly against the backdrop of European Union labour market integration. A comparative analysis is conducted between two strategically distinct countries in the region: Georgia and Estonia. Georgia is characterized as a reactive model of economic stagnation and brain drain, whereas Estonia exemplifies a proactive approach to innovation-driven development and brain gain. Migration is analyzed not only through the lens of neoclassical economic theory, specifically the Harris-Todaro model, but also from a socio-cultural perspective, incorporating concepts of social capital and innovation diffusion. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the formation of hybrid identities among migrants, bridging Eastern and Western cultural frameworks. The study aims to reveal how migration influences both domestic socioeconomic structures and the identity formation and integration of migrants within the European labour space. The findings demonstrate that, in the Georgian context, migration functions primarily as a reactive mechanism to alleviate social pressures, whereas in Estonia, it serves as a proactive instrument for structural policy implementation and innovative development. This contrast underscores the heterogeneous nature of migration management in post-Soviet countries. The practical contribution of this research lies in providing policy recommendations for Georgia, drawing on Estonia's strategies for reverse migration and innovation-driven development.
Nana Zazadze (Wed,) studied this question.