Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are transitioning from experimental neuroscience tools to commercially deployed medical devices, with companies including Neuralink, Synchron, Blackrock Neurotech, and Paradromics advancing toward regulatory approval and new entrants such as Merge Labs raising 252M in seed funding. Yet no security framework exists that accounts for the unique risks of devices that read and write neural signals. The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS v4. 0), the industry standard for vulnerability assessment, cannot express biological tissue damage, cognitive integrity violations, consent boundaries, damage reversibility, or neuroplastic consequences—dimensions critical to neural device security. We present an integrated security framework comprising four contributions: (1) an 11-band hourglass architecture mapping attack surfaces from neocortex to wireless radio across neural, interface, and synthetic zones; (2) TARA, a threat taxonomy of 102 techniques across 15 tactics and 8 domains, each classified by status, severity, and dual-use therapeutic potential; (3) NISS, the Neural Impact Scoring System—a CVSS v4. 0 extension adding five neural-specific metrics (Biological Impact, Cognitive Integrity, Consent Violation, Reversibility, Neuroplasticity) designed to conform with FIRST. org's official extension mechanism; and (4) the Neural Impact Chain, a methodology mapping security vulnerabilities to DSM-5-TR psychiatric diagnoses through a six-stage pipeline. Analysis of all 102 techniques reveals that 94. 4% require NISS extension metrics that CVSS cannot express. The Neural Impact Chain maps all techniques to 15 unique DSM-5-TR diagnostic codes across 5 psychiatric clusters, with 51 techniques posing direct diagnostic risk. The framework identifies 77 techniques (75. 5%) with confirmed or probable therapeutic analogs, establishing a dual-use atlas where every attack mechanism that can harm neural tissue has a corresponding clinical application. The complete framework, threat registry, and scoring system are released as open source under the Apache 2. 0 license.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kevin Qi
EduInnovation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kevin Qi (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69926575eb1f82dc367a1601 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18640105
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: