Abstract Background: The monarchE and NATALEE trials demonstrated significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival with the combination of adjuvant endocrine therapy and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Namely, abemaciclib and ribociclib have been used in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer. By inhibiting cell cycle progression, both abemaciclib and ribociclib can significantly improve invasive disease-free survival in selected patients. Standard indications for adjuvant CDK4/6i therapy include larger tumor size, nodal involvement, or high-risk features such as high grade, high proliferation, or high-risk genomic assay score. However, limited data exist on the indications for and use of CDK4/6i in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). ILC is the second most common subtype of breast cancer, comprising up to 15% of all breast malignancies. Nearly 90% of these tumors exhibit HR-positive and HER2-negative status, and they frequently present at a later stage with more indolent features such as lower grade, lower Ki-67, and less lymphovascular invasion than invasive ductal carcinoma. We hypothesized that given these features, a majority of patients with ILC only become eligible for CDK4/6i treatment because of their nodal status. If true, this has implications for the role of surgical staging of the axilla in patients with ILC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained institutional ILC database to identify patients with stage I-III, HR-positive, HER2-negative ILC. Patients were considered eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6i treatment if they met any of the following criteria: nodal positivity, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, or tumor size 2-5 cm with either tumor grade 3, Ki-67 ≥ 20%, or high-risk genomic assay score (MammaPrint high risk or Oncotype Dx score ≥ 26). We determined the proportion of patients with ILC who were eligible for CDK4/6i therapy overall; among those, we evaluated which eligibility criteria were met and what proportion of patients would be considered ineligible in the absence of nodal staging data. Results: From 1,027 ILC cases, we included 861 patients with stage I-III, HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors. Overall, 390 (45.3%) met at least one eligibility criteria for treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Of those, the most common indication for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment was nodal positivity, present in 255 (65.4%) patients; the mean number of positive nodes was 4.0 (range= 1-46). The next most common criteria was tumor size ≥ 5 cm (n= 201, 51.5%), followed by Ki67 20% (n= 23, 5.9%), high-risk genomic assay (n= 11, 2.8%), or tumor grade 3 (n= 8, 2.1%). Of the 255 patients with nodal positivity, 121 (47.5%) met no other eligibility criteria for CDK4/6i treatment, whereas 107 (42.0%) also had a tumor size ≥ 5 cm and 27 (10.6%) also had other high-risk features. In total, 31.0% (121/390) of patients eligible for CDK4/6i therapy met criteria for treatment based on nodal status alone. Conclusion: In patients with early stage ILC, nodal positivity is the most common indication for treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor, consistent with our hypothesis. These data suggest that implementation of surgical de-escalation strategies, namely the omission of sentinel lymph node surgery, should be applied with caution in patients with ILC. Nearly one third of ILC patients eligible for CDK4/6i therapy may no longer meet treatment criteria in the absence of confirmed nodal positivity, which is often difficult to detect based on imaging alone. Citation Format: N. S. Kim, A. Vertido, A. Quirarte, H. Batra-Sharma, E. Abeles, J. Moya, J. Chien, J. Mouabbi, R. Mukhtar. Eligibility for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in 861 patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: the importance of nodal staging for adjuvant therapy decisions abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD12-02.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
N. S. Kim
A. Vertido
Astrid Quirarte
Clinical Cancer Research
University of California, San Francisco
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Georgetown University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efccf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd12-02