Abstract Background: Since the FDA’s approval of palbociclib, the first cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CD4/6i), in 2015, these agents have transformed the treatment landscape for breast cancer (BC). In particular, the combination of CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy forms the cornerstone of the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic BC (mBC). Choosing among the 3 approved CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) remains challenging, as each has a distinct side-effect profile and there are no head-to-head trial data comparing their therapeutic efficacy. This study examines real-world prescription patterns and usage trends of CDK4/6i among patients with mBC, providing insight into evolving prescription preferences and the tolerability of these treatments. Methods: Utilizing the MarketScan health care claims database, we identified patients prescribed palbociclib, ribociclib, and/or abemaciclib from 2/2015 (post-FDA approval of palbociclib) until 12/2022 (prior to FDA approval of CDK4/6i for adjuvant use). We assessed changes in prescription rates for specific CDK4/6i over time and the frequency of switches between these agents. To evaluate treatment duration, we analyzed cohorts of patients who received their first CDK4/6i prescription in 2015, 2016, and 2017, tracking ongoing prescriptions over subsequent years. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and medians, were employed to summarize our findings. Results: A total of 13,514 patients were prescribed a CDK4/6i between 2/2015 and 12/2022 (98.2% female; 23.1% 50 yo, 14.9% 70 yo; 18.6% on Medicare, 19.9% on Medicaid). The percentage of patients 50 yo and patients covered by Medicaid prescribed CDK4/6i consistently increased over time, from 17.9% and 11.5% in 2015, to 31.8% and 22.6% in 2022, respectively (p0.0001). Conversely, the proportion of patients 70 yo and patients covered by Medicare decreased over time, from 16.9% and 24.9% in 2015, to 9.8% and 12.5% in 2022, respectively (p0.0001). In 2015-2016, all patients on CDK4/6i were prescribed palbocilcib. From 2017 to 2022, the proportion of patients on CDK4/6i prescribed ribociclib and abemaciclib consistently increased each year. By 2022, among 2,682 patients with CDK4/6i claims, 1,726 (64.4%) were prescribed abemaciclib, 508 (18.9%) were prescribed ribociclib, and 448 (16.7%) were prescribed palbociclib. Switching between CDK4/6i was infrequent, with only 854 patients (6.3%) having claims for multiple distinct CDK4/6i. The most common switch was from palbociclib to abemaciclib (62.8% of patients with claims for at least 2 CDK4/6i), followed by palbociclib to ribociclib (13.2%). Among patients with a first claim for CDK4/6i in 2015-2017, long-term persistence was noted, with 11.1% of patients starting treatment in 2015 continuing into 2018, 12.4% of those starting in 2016 continuing into 2019, and 10.8% of those starting in 2017 continuing into 2020. Conclusions: This real-world study of CDK4/6i prescription patterns following their FDA approval for mBC reveals an increasing trend in younger and lower-income patients on Medicaid receiving these agents, likely reflecting improved access and coverage. Oncologists showed a preference for newer agents such as ribociclib and abemaciclib post-approval, even prior to overall survival data becoming available. The rarity of switching between CDK4/6i suggests good tolerability. Over 10% of patients maintained long-term use of CDK4/6i into the third year after the year of their initial prescription. Citation Format: C. Sathe, R. Raghunathan, M. K. Accordino, M. M. Caplan, J. D. Wright, D. L. Hershman. Prescription Patterns and Treatment Persistence in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer on CDK4/6 Inhibitors abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-11-18.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claire Sathe
Rohit Raghunathan
M. K. Accordino
Clinical Cancer Research
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sathe et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efe6b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-11-18