Abstract Introduction: Patients with metastatic breast cancer frequently develop bone metastases and experience other skeletal-related events (SREs). These complications substantially impair quality of life and may negatively influence clinical outcomes. In this context, bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly utilized therapeutic agents. We aim to study the real-world comparative data between bisphosphonates and denosumab in breast cancer patients with bony metastases along with evaluation of their toxicity profiles. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the US Collaborative Network, TriNetX, covering January 2000 to December 2023, encompassing data from 105 global healthcare organizations. Female patients aged 18 and above with breast cancer metastatic to the bone were identified and then stratified into two groups based on treatment with zoledronic acid or pamidronate. The two groups were then propensity-matched based on age, sex, race, and comorbidities. We followed these patients for 5 years to assess outcomes, including mortality, osteoporotic fracture, hypercalcemia, pathological fracture, fall, and osteonecrosis. Results: We identified 7887 patients in the zoledronic acid cohort and 635 patients in the pamidronate cohort. After propensity matching, each cohort consisted of 625 patients with similar baseline characteristics. The average age was 66.4 years in the zoledronic acid cohort and 68.5 in the denosumab cohort. In the zoledronic acid cohort, the ethnicity distribution was 74.68 % White, 6.36% Hispanic, and 11.55% African American. In comparison, the denosumab group had an ethnicity distribution of 74.49% White, 10.31% African American, and 5.68% Hispanic. Our analysis found that within 5 years, patients with breast cancer metastatic to the bone who received zoledronic acid had a significantly lower risk of mortality (Risk difference: -3.49%, 95% Confidence Interval CI: -5.063 to -1.916), p-value 0.001) compared to denosumab. However, patients in the zoledronic acid arm were noted to have a higher risk of osteoporotic fracture (Risk difference: 0.817%, 95% CI: 0.232 to 1.402), p-value = 0.006), hypercalcemia Hazard Ratio [HR: 1.524, 95% CI: 1.407 to 1.65, p-value 0.001), and pathological fracture (HR: 1.501, 95% CI: 1.349 to 1.671), p-value =0.03). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of falls and osteonecrosis between the two subgroups. Conclusion: Our study revealed that patients with breast cancer with metastatic disease to the bone who received zoledronic acid had significantly lower rates of mortality but higher occurrence of osteoporotic fracture, hypercalcemia, and pathological fracture compared to those receiving denosumab. Additional longitudinal cohort studies are imperative to explore the outcomes between these agents and inform clinical practice guidelines in these patients. Citation Format: A. Syal, Y. Arya, C. Jones, H. Mahadevia, N. Batra, A. Uriepero Palma. Real-world outcomes comparing zoledronic acid and denosumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer and bone metastases: A propensity score matched analysis from a global federated health research network abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-17.
Syal et al. (Tue,) studied this question.