Lithium-ion battery fires present increasing safety engineering challenges, with U.S. incident rates rising 86% between 2020 and 2023, particularly in micromobility devices and urban environments. We analyzed 148 lithium-ion battery fire incidents documented through the Massachusetts State Fire Marshal’s specialized checklist program, employing logistic regression for charging-related risks, spatial clustering for geographic patterns, and time-series analysis for temporal trends. Consumer electronics showed significantly lower odds of charging-related fires (OR = 0.125–0.148, p < 0.05), while micromobility devices had the highest injury rate (IRR = 2.98, 95% CI: 0.837–10.615). Charging was involved in 40.5% of cases, and online purchases were associated with greater risk (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.23–2.84, p = 0.003). Significant urban clustering was observed (Moran’s I = 0.28, p = 0.003) with three metropolitan hotspots. Device-specific risk profiles demonstrate the effectiveness of existing consumer electronics safety standards and highlight critical intervention points for emerging high-risk devices, particularly in dense urban areas where targeted protection strategies are most needed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew Bucala
Dac Nguyen
Holli Knight
Fire Technology
University of Michigan
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fire Safety Design
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bucala et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69994b41873532290d01f6eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-026-01876-5
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: