AbstractThe paper intricately explores the complex dynamics among knowledge, power and gender to establish how patriarchy may have influenced archival practices leading to a compromised production of authenticate history. Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Michel Foucault’s power-knowledge nexus and feminist epistemologists such as Donna Haraway and Sandra Harding, the study aims to highlight how gender is systemically marginalised within conventional discourses and highlights, thus leading to what scholars refer to as archival silence. The paper advocates for feminist epistemology with its emphasis on situated knowledge and standpoint theory as a mechanism to redefine archives as a space of resistance rather than passive repositories of data. The paper also highlights the interventions of feminist historiography and the transformative role of libraries and community archives in reclaiming the lost voices and histories of women in androcentric discourses. Through case studies of libraries and archival initiatives that make an effort to re-establish women’s narratives, the paper brings into focus how feminist archival practices create inclusive spaces that shed significance on marginalised voices, preserve the intellectual contributions of women and foster collective memory. Moreover, the study also focuses on the importance of digitisation in democratising access for women, especially in remote areas to archival knowledge. The paper positions feminist archiving within broader debates on epistemic justice and social transformation to posit libraries and digital archives as active agents in feminist knowledge production besides being curators of history. These interventions are aimed at challenging androcentric historiography, reimagining archives as agents of empowerment and contribute to a more inclusive and holistic understanding of the past, present and future.
Bhattacharjee et al. (Wed,) studied this question.