# TitleYang–Mills Mass Gap via OS Windows: a Sealed, Auditable Proof Interface (physicsₛtrict packet, v10. 2r) # OverviewThis record releases **v10. 2r** of a Yang–Mills mass-gap program organized around an **OS-window proof interface**: a finite, hash-locked *anchor witness* + a mechanically auditable pipeline that outputs a PASS/FAIL verdict underdeclared strict profiles. The central idea is that the reader-facing object is not an informal “numerical evidence” claim, but a **sealedcertificate interface**: a public packet must reproduce (from a fixed inputs ledger) the reports, contracts, and manifest bindings whose checked inequalities trigger the downstream analytic upgrade. # Contents- **Sealed proof-interface packet (ZIP): ** `YMMGₚktᵥ10. 2ₚhysicsₛtrictₛealed. zip` - includes `README. md`, `docs/`, `scripts/`, `results/`, and manifest bindings. - **Audit outputs inside the packet** - `results/auditᵣeport. json` (overall PASS/FAIL) - `results/verifier2ᵣeport. json` (independent recomputation Verifier4 is **no-warnings** (any mismatch is a FAIL). - **Contract ↔ manifest binding without cycles. ** `manifestcore. json` excludes volatile auditor outputs and the contract itself; `results/strictₐnchorcontract. json` binds the anchor witness to `manifestcoreₛha256`. - **E5-min schema upgrade to v1. 4** `scripts/augmentₑ5ᵣeportᵢntervals. py` inserts interval enclosures (`*ᵢv`) and decimal midpoints (`*dec`) for PASS-critical scalars. # Scope it asks them to reproduce a sealed, finite object whosechecked inequalities and bindings are mechanically verified. # KeywordsYang–Mills mass gap; lattice gauge theory; Osterwalder–Schrader axioms; reflection positivity;spectral gap; log-Sobolev inequality; Wilson action; Wilson flow; computational proof;reproducibility; certificate; manifest; audit pipeline # Suggested citation (Provide your preferred author line here), “Yang–Mills Mass Gap via OS Windows: a Sealed, Auditable Proof Interface (physicsₛtrict packet, v10. 2) ”, Zenodo (2026). YMMGᵥ10. 2ᵣ3ₛtrictₛimulationₙoteₚatched7. pdfb9c8e3f51c2c2d7a6d932f2622d3fd1b5d99a61f1bd03263c2f1efc8e8ff6f6b YMMGᵥ10. 2ᵣ3ₛtrictₛimulationₙoteₚatched7. texa3febd864b4b6d4f9705cdfb4f309f5bf11696ca49719027c4255beba004e50d
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Byoungwoo Lee
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Byoungwoo Lee (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa03ad1d9b11b3452eb6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18678774
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: