THE BIBLIOGRAPHY AND DATA PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AGAINST THE POLITICO-SOCIAL CONSENSUS NARRATIVE ON CLIMATE CHANGE IS IMMENSE, VAST AND HIGHLY CITED WITH THE MOST ATHORATATIVE SOURCES CURRENTLY IN THE EXISTING LITERATURE ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND EARTH SCIENCES. ONE MUST THEN ASK THEMSELVES, WHY SUCH SCIENTIFIC DATA EXISTS IF THERE IS A “SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS” TO THE CONTRARY? Introduction In a brazen affront to the sacrosanct principles of scientific inquiry and the liberal ideals of truth-seeking, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has unapologetically proclaimed its intention to assume the role as the “ultimate epistemic authority in matters of climate policy” and to “speak with one voice for climate science” (Beck et al. 2014;1 Hoppe 3 Hoppe 4 van der Sluijs et al. 2010;5 Curry 6 Sarewitz 2011;7 Hulme 2013).8 This Orwellian declaration of intellectual hegemony is a stark betrayal of the scientific method, which is founded upon the principles of skepticism, open-mindedness, and the relentless pursuit of empirical truth. The IPCC, by anointing itself as the sole arbiter of climate truth, has effectively silenced the cacophony of dissenting voices that are essential to the scientific process, thereby stifling the very essence of intellectual freedom. Nearly all public opinion on Climate Change and climate policy comes from the IPCC and their parenting affiliates’ mantra and rhetoric, rather than the international body of independent empirical literature and broad-scale experimental studies. It is apparent that rather than being a scientific body, the IPCC rather functions as a political body; a mouthpiece used to garnish grand-scale cultural “consensus” to affect a grand eco-socialist political vision that could not otherwise be enacted in lieu of such mass consensus. This fact becomes more obvious when we examine their demonstrably corrupt peer-review process coupled with its pre-tailored-biased modeling techniques which contradict the reality painted by the empirical data and nearly all experimental observations of the real world1 (Balling (2005);2 Christy (2005);3Essex and McKitrick (2007);4 Frauenfeld (2005);5 Michaels (2000, 2005, 2009);6 Pilkey and Pilkey-Jarvis (2007);7 Posmentier and Soon (2005);8 Spencer (2008)).9 In this context, it is nothing short of genocidal to push for life-altering, world-transforming policies that are based on a flawed, ideologically driven narrative that is fundamentally at odds with the empirical evidence. The IPCC's actions constitute a grave threat to humanity, as they seek to impose a non-incremental, eco-socialist vision on the world, predicated on a false narrative that is designed to justify the most sweeping and draconian policy interventions. It is our duty to resist this Orwellian nightmare, to reclaim the integrity of the scientific process, and to restore the primacy of empirical evidence in the formulation of sound climate policy. In this document I provide all the voices that have been suppressed by the IPCC mechanism, all the evidence at odds with the current climate narrative.
Andrushka Burmastrova (Thu,) studied this question.