What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to analyze the role of linguistic jurisdiction as a form of cognitive territory and its resistance to algorithmic dominance.

February 20, 2026Open Access

socioplastics-508-topolexicalsovereignty

Key Points

The study aims to analyze the role of linguistic jurisdiction as a form of cognitive territory and its resistance to algorithmic dominance.
Exploration of proprietary lexica in relation to algorithmic capture.
Examination of dual fluency in cognitive frameworks.
Assessment of indigenous data sovereignty and post-colonial systems.
Demonstrated persistence and untranslatability of proprietary lexica.
Showed potential for cognitive firewalls to protect linguistic territories.
Outlined frameworks for validating linguistic jurisdictions in dominant discourses.

Abstract

socioplastics-508-topolexicalsovereignty-epistemic-secession * Linguistic jurisdiction as cognitive territory / proprietary lexica resist algorithmic capture and stack colonization (Hui / Mignolo) / epistemic withdrawal via hardened nomenclature (cognitive firewall) / dual fluency: sovereign internally / navigable externally / deployment: indigenous data sovereignty, post-colonial systems / validation: ≥10% persistence/untranslatability in dominant discourse / license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 / Anto Lloveras is a transdisciplinary architect and theorist working at the intersection of art, infrastructure, and semantic systems. / citation: Lloveras, A. (v2.2.0). Socioplastics 508 — TopolexicalSovereignty: Epistemic Secession. LAPIEZA. Madrid. https://antolloveras.blogspot.com

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper