The growing emphasis on 21st-century competencies highlights the need to develop students’ systems thinking and problem-solving, particularly in science education, where many concepts involve complex, dynamic relationships. This study examined differences in fifth-grade students’ systems thinking performance and problem-solving perceptions associated with simulation-supported science instruction within the unit Electricity in Our Lives. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design was used with two intact classes, in which the experimental group received PhET-supported instruction and a control group followed the national curriculum. Data were collected through a systems thinking test (multiple-choice and open-ended items) and a problem-solving perception scale. The results showed that, after adjusting for baseline scores, the simulation-supported group demonstrated higher posttest systems thinking scores than the control group, with a large effect size. For problem-solving perceptions, the simulation-supported group also showed higher posttest scores compared to the control group. In addition, a moderate positive correlation was observed between systems thinking performance and problem-solving perceptions. Although causal inferences are limited due to the use of two intact classes and the absence of individual-level random assignment, the findings suggest that interactive simulations may support students’ holistic reasoning and engagement in problem-solving processes. The study highlights the potential value of integrating interactive simulations into science curricula to promote deeper cognitive competencies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ummuhan Ormanci
Systems
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ummuhan Ormanci (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9da0482488d673cd38d3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020222