Cryptocurrency fraud represents one of the fastest-growing financial crimes worldwide, yet the psychological mechanisms that enable these scams remain understudied. Drawing on 282 verified victim narratives from California and Wisconsin state crypto scam trackers (2023–2024), this study systematically coded the use of seven psychological tactics (PTacs) and seven psychological techniques (PTechs) previously validated in cyber social engineering research. Fraudulent trading platforms (51. 5%) and pig-butchering schemes (33. 7%) dominated the sample. Across all cases, scammers relied overwhelmingly on impersonation and persuasion techniques paired with fit-and-form and familiarity tactics. On average, 1. 77 tactics and 1. 86 techniques were deployed per incident; higher psychological complexity (4–6 combined elements) was significantly associated with greater financial losses in fraudulent trading platform scams (135, 346 vs. 63, 034, p =. 029). These findings demonstrate that cryptocurrency fraud resembles more of a repeatable, psychologically-engineered “playbook” rather than random opportunism by unorganized actors. By revealing consistent patterns of manipulation that scale harm, our study provides an evidence-based roadmap for prevention: psychologically informed user education, platform-level disruption of scripted interaction sequences, standardized narrative reporting in complaint systems, and proactive regulatory alerts keyed to emerging PTac/PTech signatures. Implementing these targeted interventions can materially reduce both victimization rates and aggregate financial losses in digital asset markets.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brandon Dulisse
Chivon H. Fitch
Nathan T. Connealy
Journal of Economic Criminology
Institute of Criminology
University of Tampa
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dulisse et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699bee1c1c6c6bad5397fdc6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2026.100211