The article introduces "Ceramic Theology," a hermeneutic framework demonstrating how the pottery metaphor of Genesis 2–3 encodes a complete technological logic — firing, irreversibility, inert residue — that has shaped Western death culture for two millennia without ever being consciously articulated as a theological position. While biblical scholarship has long recognised the "potter" motif (yatsar), this study extends the metaphor to the full ceramic process: the divine breath as kiln firing, the Fall as hairline fracture in the vessel, and bodily death as ceramic irreversibility. The concept of grog — ground-up fired ceramic reintroduced into new clay — provides material proof: the ceramic cycle is a closed loop that formally excludes biological return. The article traces the metaphor's transmission through John Chrysostom's Homilies on Genesis and the Orthodox funeral liturgy, showing how the latter preserves both ceramic and regenerative registers in unresolved tension. It further argues that Ceramic Theology reinforces the hierarchical logic of the scala naturae, making decomposition legible as ontological demotion and producing what I term Decarnis: culturally transmitted shame of the mortal, decomposing body. While theologically coherent, this logic proves ecologically inadequate — organic bodies compost cyclically, whereas fired ceramics persist as inert shards. The article concludes by identifying resources for repair within the tradition itself, particularly the Eucharist, where the Divine is placed in fermented bread and wine — products of the very microbial transformation that Ceramic Theology elsewhere frames as shameful.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katerina Tsempeli
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katerina Tsempeli (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699ba05e72792ae9fd86fc1d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/gak2e-6ws33
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: