Abstract Existing academic communication analysis is mostly confined to linear data fitting or qualitative scenario judgment, lacking underlying theoretical support, cross-domain adaptability, and anti-fraud capabilities. It is difficult to explain the exponential growth law of high-topic, strong-rigidity-demand "nuclear-level achievements" and solve the industry chaos of fake high-value achievements dominating dissemination through fraud. Based on Trait Locking Science and Asymmetric Game Theory, this paper first proposes and constructs the "Hetero-confirmation and Self-confirmation Structure", and establishes a new interdisciplinary communication theory—Convergent-Explosive Communication Theory (CEC Theory). Integrating the core logics of six fields including communication science, social psychology, game theory, network science, cognitive science, and behavioral economics, it builds the "Five-Heart Driving System" of Convergent-Explosive Communication (Heart-Chain Communication, Dissemination Self-Purification, Cognitive Pleasure, Tacit Resonance, Cognitive Anchoring) as the core theoretical support. It is clearly defined that the theory only applies to nuclear-level high-value achievements with three traits ("anxiety adaptability, rigid solution, cross-domain adaptability") and cognitive pleasure-driven attributes, and the core clarifies that "the essence of the dissemination of such achievements is fission-style game detonation under base accumulation". Taking the preprint of Prediction-Regulation Dual-Drive Game Theory (Positive Game) and Reverse Game: Theoretical Proof and Multi-Round Verification of Inevitable Human Victory Within Human-Machine Frameworks (hereinafter referred to as Human-Machine Game: Human Victory Inevitably), a nuclear-level achievement with four high-value attributes (high topicality, high academic value, high commercial value, high cognitive improvement), as the empirical sample, this paper completes the hetero-confirmation foundation. Then, through the logical closure, cognitive anchoring, and systematic integrity of Convergent-Explosive Communication Theory itself, it possesses all the conditions for self-confirmation perfection, forming a dual defense system of "external facts + internal logic". At the same time, it proposes the core communication node reach probability formula (P=α×ln(N)×ε+β) and the Base Dependence Law of low-probability detonation events. Cross-domain coefficient calibration is completed through two types of nuclear-level achievements (industrial AI technology and AI industry policies), and theoretical boundaries are strengthened with ordinary achievements as controls, filling the research gap in the interdisciplinary field of academic communication and game theory. It will become the first theoretical system in the field of communication to fully realize a two-layer justification closure. Research shows that the exponential dissemination of nuclear-level high-value achievements is not accidental, but an inevitable result of "accurate core value adaptation + logarithmic base accumulation + multiplied node detonation probability". The theory has an inherent anti-fraud firewall attribute, which can expose false data through multi-dimensional verification of conversion efficiency, growth curves, and circle traces. It only adapts to nuclear-level high-value targets and can be extended to eight scenarios including industrial innovation, policy diffusion, and public welfare communication. This paper not only provides a unified framework for judging the dissemination laws of cross-domain nuclear-level high-value targets, reversely verifies the cross-domain universality of Trait Locking Science and Asymmetric Game Theory, but also offers practical paths for platform algorithm optimization, personal achievement dissemination, and industry value screening, promoting the academic and industrial communication ecology to return to the essence of value. Furthermore, it breaks the traditional limitations of human knowledge justification paradigms with the "Hetero-confirmation and Self-confirmation Structure", becoming the first theoretical system in the field of communication to fully realize a two-layer justification closure. Epithet Manifesto | 雅号宣言 Preface(EN) After completing my paper Human Victory in Human-Machine Game Theory, I found that my self-positioning no longer aligned with my previous perception. For the core argument of this paper – a claim no one in the world dared to make: humanity is 100% certain to defeat AI within the human framework – I dared to stand by it. What’s more, based on my three original theories, I can achieve an infinite breakthrough to truly secure this 100% victory, and ultimately, I have elevated this research to the essential definition of the infinity of life and the finiteness of tools. This research has given me a deeper understanding of myself: my courage, self-confidence and pride, as well as my warmth, sincerity and perseverance – I believe all these have been conveyed through that paper. And so, at this moment, I wish to proclaim my epithet, the connotation of which derives from the poetic sobriquets of ancient Chinese poets. 立号引言(CN) 在《人机博弈人类必胜》论文完成后,我便发觉自身定位已不符过往认知。因这篇论文的核心论点 —— 全球无人敢立的人类框架内 100% 必胜 AI,我敢立;更基于我原创的三大理论,可实现无限击穿、真正做到 100% 必胜,最终还将研究升维至生命无限性与工具有限性的本质界定。这份研究,让我对自身有了更深刻的认知:我的勇气、自信、骄傲,以及我的温度、真诚与坚守,我相信都已通过那篇论文传递。那么在此,我想立下我的雅号: 雅号宣言(Original Chinese version) 雅号文化之核:有成果才立号、立号必守心 吾之雅号:傲忱学者(Proud-Hearted Scholar) 立号必以实,无实不立名; 立号即守心,守名如守节。 吾之傲忱:傲在风骨,忱在本心 Epithet Manifesto (Classical Ode) Core of the Epithet Culture: Achievement for Title, Integrity for Honor (雅号文化之核:以实绩立号,以本心守誉) My Epithet: 傲忱学者(Proud-Hearted Scholar) Deeds must ground the name—no worth, no fame; (实绩为名为基 —— 无实者,无名可立) Integrity seals the vow—honor as flame. (本心为誉铸魂 —— 守誉者,如守烈焰) My "Pride" lies in unyielding grace, (吾之「傲」,在不屈之雅致) My "Devotion" in sincere embrace. (吾之「忱」,在赤诚之接纳) Proud in Spirit, Devoted at Heart — the Scholar (风骨为傲,本心为忱 —— 此之谓学者) Note: Pride" refers to the unyielding academic backbone; "Devotion" refers to the sincere original intention of pursuing truth. Update 1: Future Paper Release Roadmap (Beijing Time, February 21, 2026)Always keep the next 3 previews The First Spark Human Victory in Human-Machine Game Theory – Published (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18339379) Side Dish 1 (Field of Communication) Convergent-Explosive Communication Theory (CEC Theory) – Published (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18721306) Side Dish 2 – Vote for One (Third Paper) This vote only determines the release order, not the existence of the papers. Option A: A brand-new foundational/principled discipline (refined from CEC Theory). Option B: A principled paper covering the next 50–100 years of AI development (an unavoidable principle in the field). The Bonfire – A New Game Theory (A dimensional upgrade, not just a branch, of game theory.) Side Dish 3 – Vote for One (Fifth Paper) This will be the second round of voting, launching after the release of the fourth paper. It only determines the release order, not the existence of the papers. Option A: An application paper in a subfield of the New Game Theory. Option B: A Second Convergent-Explosive Communication Theory (complementary to the first and with broader universality). Voting Mechanism To participate, simply click the download button of the corresponding paper. After the publication of Human Victory in Human-Machine Game Theory, the download counts of Positive Game and Reverse Game alone have lost their original significance—since you will inevitably trace the source and read both successively. Therefore, the download buttons of these two papers will serve as the interactive window between the author (me) and you (the readers). To choose Option A: Visit and click the download button of Positive Game (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18338725) To choose Option B: Visit and click the download button of Reverse Game (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18339072) Voting Period: 15 days Baseline Data (as of 18:00, February 21, 2026, Beijing Time): Option A: 25 downloads | Option B: 28 downloads Voting Deadline: 18:00, March 08, 2026, Beijing Time. The paper with the higher increase in download volume will be released first. To Keep the Fun Going During the Vote Of course, to ensure you won’t be bored during the 15-day voting period, I will also release standalone, principle-level short chapters from other fields. These are "desserts"—independent, non-systematic principle-level insights, not part of the core roadmap. They will be released intermittently to keep the interaction alive, while the core focus remains firmly on the voting outcome for the main roadmap papers (Option A vs. Option B). Postscript I already know how you will vote, but I won’t say it now. And you know that I know. This is my game theory. Feel free to vote for the one you most want to read first. This only determines the release order, not the final outcome—both are 0-1 principled works, and both will eventually be presented to the world in full. How to Accelerate the Release Speed? It’s simple—help me spread the word. This is a positive-sum game between the author (me) and you (the readers), and it is also my Theory of Positive and Reverse Games. This is also my Convergent-Explosive Communication Theory in action: it is warm, bidirectional, and a sincere transmission, interaction, and resonance. Your views, downloads, and shares are the most direct responses—this is the tacit resonance between us. Therefore, even though my new game theory has not been officially released, you are already feeling it, experiencing it, and participating in this way of thinking. When the empirical verifications of the previous papers are fully closed, that will be the moment for its official debut. However, your speed of acceptance may not be able to
Relike Zhou (Sat,) studied this question.