This paper explores the intricate application of Article 11 of the Insolvency Directive concerning the utilization of cram-down tools within the insolvency frameworks of Italy and Romania. The directive aims to harmonize insolvency laws across the European Union, facilitating efficient restructuring processes while safeguarding the interests of creditors and debtors alike. Article 11 introduces the ‘cram-down’ mechanism, empowering courts to approve a restructuring plan even if not all creditors consent, under certain conditions. This paper delves into how Italy and Romania have transposed this provision into their legal systems, highlighting the similarities and disparities in implementation. It examines the procedural requirements, creditor protections, judicial discretion, and the impact on restructuring dynamics in both jurisdictions. By analysing case law, legislative texts, and scholarly commentary, this essay offers insights into the effectiveness and challenges of integrating cram-down tools into the Italian and Romanian insolvency regimes, shedding light on broader implications for European insolvency law harmonization.
Spiotta et al. (Sun,) studied this question.