Her er beskrivelsen af Paper 17, helt renset for HTML og formateret pænt overskueligt som ren tekst til Zenodo: Paper 17 in the ABM Blueprint Independent Research Series. Extending the External PFC Hypothesis (Paper 16), this paper maps how healthcare training pathways function as cognitive selection filters that produce predictable attachment-profile concentrations in different professions. The analysis applies PAG columnar theory to professional selection as an institutional analog of individual attachment calibration. Key contributions: Seven Selection Filters: Entry examination, core methodology, emotional norm, knowledge validation, career advancement, failure mode tolerated, and personal therapy requirement — each selecting for different PFC-PAG configurations across academic psychology, clinical psychotherapy, and trauma-specialized therapy. Complementary Blind Spots: Architects (academic psychology) undervalue somatic and relational data. Radars (clinical psychotherapy) undervalue systematic methodology. Special Forces (trauma therapy) undervalue consistency and protocol adherence. Each blind spot is the structural cost of each profile's genuine strength. Research-Practice Gap as Profile Mismatch: The well-documented gap between clinical research and clinical practice is reframed as a cognitive profile mismatch — knowledge produced by Architect-profile researchers in Architect-compatible formats fails to translate for Radar/Special Forces-profile clinicians. Credentialing as Cognitive Monoculture: Professional credentialing systems designed to ensure competency simultaneously narrow cognitive diversity within each profession. Cognitive Biodiversity: Proposes profile-aware training design, interprofessional cognitive complementarity, and AI as ecosystem equalizer. Critical framing: The analysis is descriptive, not normative. No profession is criticized for its selection effects. Selection effects are structural consequences of task-environment alignment. Understanding them enables compensation; ignoring them perpetuates fragmentation. Companion Papers: SADA Framework (Paper 1) · Superposition-Collapse Model (Paper 2) · SADA Recalibration Protocol (Paper 4) · Dual-Mode Hypothesis (Paper 11) · Temporal-Object Drama Triangle (Paper 13A) · The Inverted Hierarchy (Paper 15) · The External PFC Hypothesis (Paper 16) Note: Part of the Professional Distress Triad (Papers 6, 17, 18). For clinical tools and the full ABM protocol: https://abm-blueprint.org
Flemming Bust (Mon,) studied this question.