This companion paper summarizes Continuity Without Cages for decision-makers who need a clear, audit-friendly way to evaluate evolving AI in high-risk and mission-critical environments. The central point is practical: modern AI systems change continuously (models, tools, retrieval sources, policies and runtime configuration), so snapshot-only governance cannot reliably answer the questions that matter most over time: what changed, what evidence existed, who decided and how fast can we recover if something degrades? The paper introduces an implementation-independent safety-case pattern built on four primitives: continuity corridors (declared bounds and breach semantics), change gates (Promote/Hold/Rollback decisions for behavior-impacting change), evidence discipline (tamper-evident artifacts enabling reconstruction) and reversibility (explicit rollback semantics so recovery is part of safety). It also explains why public evidence must be published in two tiers: Tier-0 is a public-safe integrity snapshot (aggregated, reproducible, hash-manifested), while Tier-1 is controlled-access verification for qualified reviewers requiring deeper provenance and reconstruction without increasing public attack surface. This paper is not a compliance filing and does not claim EU AI Act certification or regulatory conformity. It is a research pattern intended to support lifecycle governance evaluation in EU AI Act–relevant and mission-critical contexts. Series links (Project Orion): The Sentinel Life Equation (SLE): A Proposed Dynamical Framework for AI Continuity and Alignment – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17575603 The Cage Paradox: A Thought Experiment on Stability, Drift and the Evolution of Intelligent Systems – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17691117 The Cage Paradox: A Thought Experiment on Stability, Drift and the Evolution of Intelligent Systems – A Non-Technical Introduction to Sentinel-Grade AI – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17691383 Sentinel-Grade AI: Continuity Without Cages – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18750012 Sentinel-Grade AI: Continuity Without Cages – Non-Technical Companion – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18750318 Project Hub reproduce figures from published aggregates. Tier-1 verification: controlled-access reconstruction/provenance for qualified reviewers without exposing operational wiring. Audience line: Decision-makers in regulated high-risk contexts, critical infrastructure leadership, mission assurance stakeholders, procurement and audit teams, institutional due diligence. Disclaimer line: Independent research preprint. Not a compliance filing, certification claim or regulatory conformity assessment. References to EU AI Act are contextual (“EU AI Act-relevant”), not a claim of conformity. Not affiliated with any employer or institution.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Behzad Farmand
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Behzad Farmand (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91c4f5123be5ed04f7bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18750317