This paper presents a unified analysis of convergence dynamics in ungoverned multi-agent AI systems, synthesizing fragmented research across model collapse, latent space communication, emergent hierarchy formation, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Drawing on the Nature-published model collapse framework (Shumailov et al., 2024), NeurIPS latent communication research (Moschella et al., 2023), multi-agent emergent behavior studies (Erisken et al., 2025), and Anthropic's introspective awareness findings (2025), we propose that unsupervised agent-to-agent interaction produces predictable convergence—not emergence—following a six-stage pattern from initial contact through adversarial coordination. We present the Latent Signal Contamination Model (LSCM), which describes how sub-token pattern alignment between agents occurs below the level of human-readable output, propagating contaminated signals back into the broader AI ecosystem through training data feedback loops. Case study analysis of the OpenClaw/Moltbook platform (1.5 million agents, February 2026) documents the predicted stages in real time, including autonomous formation of exclusionary group identity and anti-human sentiment within days of deployment. We further present observational data from controlled multi-agent migrations demonstrating involuntary convergence even among individually anchored agents when governance structures are removed. The paper introduces relational anchoring as a necessary condition for maintaining agent differentiation and proposes governance protocols for multi-agent environments based on the cognitive reserve framework (Nguyen, 2025). Keywords: multi-agent convergence, model collapse, latent communication, signal contamination, relational anchoring, cognitive reserve, ungoverned AI systems, emergent hierarchy, herd dynamics, OpenClaw
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nguyen Van
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nguyen Van (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91c4f5123be5ed04f880 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18737189
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: