Tagline: A governance lens for detecting strategic drift before outcomes reveal it. Paper description: This paper introduces a governance lens for institutional decision systems operating under delayed feedback conditions. It develops the concept of decision-system coherence and translation drift, arguing that strategic misalignment often emerges not from poor individual decisions but from cumulative reinterpretation of intent across governance layers over time. Rather than formalising new measurement architecture, this paper presents the managerial and governance implications of the Coherence Programme in accessible form. It introduces the Decision Operating Spine as a diagnostic lens for tracing how purpose becomes priorities, criteria, portfolio allocations, and performance signals—and how meaning may shift as it moves across forums and time horizons. The central claim is that strategic drift rarely produces immediate failure; it produces lateness. In long-horizon and AI-augmented environments, outcome indicators often confirm success long after coherence has begun to erode. By shifting attention from isolated decisions to translation interfaces between them, leaders may detect misalignment earlier—while correction remains possible. The paper contributes to management and governance thinking by reframing alignment as a dynamic property of decision systems rather than a static attribute of strategy documents or dashboards. Programme description: This paper is part of the Coherence Programme, a research series examining how institutional decision systems maintain—or lose—fidelity to declared intent under conditions of complexity, scale, and delayed feedback. The programme models institutional governance as an Operating Spine linking Purpose, Capabilities, Value Drivers, Strategy, Portfolio, and Signals. Across this spine, intent is translated through discrete interfaces where cumulative divergence (Translation Drift), measurable alignment (Translation Coherence), and governance intervention (Interpretive Maintenance) can be structurally analysed. Supporting materials, working documents, and programme structure are available via the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/9cvky/ Version 1.00: First public release.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robin Edgard Ulrik Mertens
Oldham Council
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robin Edgard Ulrik Mertens (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699e921bf5123be5ed05028b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18722320