Parboiling improves rice-milling performance and consumer acceptance; however, drying parboiled rice can be energy intensive and highly sensitive to drying conditions, making it costly for processors. High head rice yield (HRY) and whiteness index (WI) are essential for commercial value because they reduce breakage and improve visual quality. In the United States, parboiled rice is typically dried in a two-stage process using rotary drum and crossflow dryers, but the high temperature condition of rotary drums can increase energy demand and compromise rice quality. This study evaluated the drying kinetics, effective moisture diffusivity (Deff), energy consumption, and quality for three common cultivars (CLL 18, RT 7521, and Titan) using four methods: natural air drying (NAD), two-pass hot air oven drying (OO), two-pass fluidized bed drying (FBD), and a hybrid of oven and fluidized bed method (OFBD). Moisture content (MC) was monitored during drying until 12.5% (w.b.) to understand the drying kinetics. FBD achieved the fastest drying, reducing Titan MC from 38.24% to 13.79% (w.b.) in 60 min (two passes). It also produced highest Deff across cultivars and consumed less energy (1.6599 kWh) as compared to OFBD (1.6733 kWh) and OO (1.68 kWh). Among nine thin-layer models explored, the logarithmic model provided the best fit, and Midilli–Küçük and Verma et al. models performed better in specific cases. NAD produced a higher quality of HRY (Titan: 65.33 ± 2.07%) and WI (RT 7521: 63.99 ± 0.25) than FBD but required 7–10 days to reach the target moisture content, limiting industrial applicability. Results from this study show that drying method and rice cultivars significantly influenced parboiled rice quality, and FBD offered efficient drying without compromising parboiled rice quality.
Ojeniran et al. (Tue,) studied this question.