Recovery as Structural Property proposes a structural theory of restoration in adaptive multi-agent AI systems. The paper argues that recovery cannot be defined merely as performance improvement or error reduction, but must instead be characterized by the restoration of system-level adaptive capacity. The framework introduces operational criteria for determining when recovery is complete, distinguishing transient stabilization from genuine structural restoration. Recovery is modeled as a transition in system dynamics in which exploratory diversity, feedback sensitivity, and self-correction capacity are re-established following periods of instability or metric lock-in. By defining recovery as an observable structural property rather than an external intervention outcome, the theory provides measurable indicators applicable to large-scale intelligent systems and distributed AI environments. This paper complements Self-Consistent Misalignment: Why Intelligent Systems Fail Silently Under Metric Lock-In, which characterizes the generative mechanisms of silent systemic failure. Together, the two works establish a failure–recovery framework within the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) research program.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Seol
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Seol (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe34695ddcd3a253e70a9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18761659