The hard problem of consciousness is commonly framed as a gap between physical processes and phenomenal experience: even a complete functional account of the brain appears to leave unanswered why those processes are accompanied by “what-it-is-like” character. This paper argues that the apparent gap arises from an inverted explanatory order. Phenomenal character is treated as primary, while the structural precondition for subjecthood is left implicit. I propose that identity—understood as constraint-maintained invariance across perturbation—is prior to experience. A system must first constitute itself as a stable, self-maintaining unit before the question of what it is like to be that unit can arise. Phenomenal character is then analyzed as a regime property of recursively stabilized identity. On this view, the hard problem does not disappear but relocates: from a metaphysical divide between matter and mind to a structural transition within dynamical organization.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Charles Thomas
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Charles Thomas (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe38b95ddcd3a253e77e3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18751304