Risk Communication and Infodemic Misframing in Legionella spp. Environmental Surveillance: An Infodemiology Case Study

Travel-associated Legionnaires’ disease (TALD) events can generate public concern when environmental surveillance findings are communicated without an adequate explanation of the results. This study examined how surveillance data on Legionella spp. were framed and amplified during a TALD-related investigation in Crete, Greece, from June to July 2025. A mixed infodemiology and environmental surveillance approach was applied, including the analysis of 95 online media items across nine languages, Google Trends search-interest data, and hotel water-system surveillance data from epidemiologically linked facilities. Sampling conducted in a limited number of hotels associated with TALD cases indicated that approximately 50% of the water samples exceeded the laboratory reporting limit of ≥50 CFU/L for Legionella spp., a numerically correct but context-specific finding. Numerical misframing occurred in 83.7%, 41.7%, and 18.2% of Greek, German, and English language items, respectively, with significant differences across language markets (χ2 (8) = 43.75, p < 0.0001; Cramér’s V = 0.679). Public search-interest signals were transient and geographically limited. Environmental surveillance showed no increase in Legionella pneumophila risk, with similar proportions of samples ≥50 CFU/L in the pre-/peri-infodemic (January–July 2025) and post-infodemic (August–November 2025) periods (23.11% 95% CI: 18.21–28.87 vs. 24.45% 19.34–30.41) and similar exceedance of ≥1000 CFU/L (13.45% 9.69–18.36 vs. 14.41% 10.45–19.55). Overall, the loss of contextual interpretation of surveillance results and conflation of laboratory reporting limits with regulatory thresholds were associated with inconsistent public risk perception, without evidence of increased environmental hazard.