35 Background: To investigate cancer-control outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving Lutetium-177 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-617 (Lu-177-PSMA) radioligand therapy according to initial baseline tumor characteristics. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP (FRAnkfurt Metastatic Cancer database of the Prostate) database to assess progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) in patients receiving Lu-177-PSMA as first to seventh mCRPC line, according to initial time of metastasis (synchronous vs. metachronous), tumor grading (Gleason score GS 6-7 vs. 8-10) and M-stage (M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c) at initial metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Kaplan-Meier curve analyses and multivariable Cox regression were applied. Results: Of 344 Lu-177-PSMA mCRPC patients, 198 (58%) had synchronous vs. 146 (42%) metachronous mHSPC, 87 (29%) vs. 107 (62%) GS 6-7 vs. 8-10 and 15 (10%) vs. 121 (81%) vs. 13 (9%) M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mHSPC disease. Regarding cancer-control outcomes, no significant differences were observed in PFS (12.1 vs. 13.0 months) and OS (14.9 vs. 18.3 months) between synchronous and metachronous patients (both p≥0.1). Further, no differences were found in PFS (12.9 vs. 11.8 months) and OS (21.4 vs. 15.1 months) between GS 6-7 vs. GS 8-10 (both p≥0.3). Finally, in M-stage stratified analyses, M1a and M1b patients harbored more favorable survival outcomes compared to M1c in OS (17.9 vs. 17.7 vs. 9.0 months, p=0.01), but not for PFS (11.9 vs. 9.5 vs. 8.2 months, p=0.08). In multivariable Cox regression models adjusted additionally for ECOG status, neither initial time of metastasis, GS 8-10 nor M-stage were independently associated with worse PFS and OS outcomes. Conclusions: Lu-177-PSMA presents a viable therapeutic option providing favourable cancer-control outcomes in mCRPC patients across all subgroups of initially mHSPC patients, such as timing of metastatic disease, different tumor gradings and M-stage categories.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Quynh Chi Le
Lisa Rehm
Carolin Siech
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Heidelberg University
Université de Montréal
Universität Hamburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Le et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cc8ed48f933b5eed82ae — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.35
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: