Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging influenced inpatient management by prompting major medication changes in 44.76% and revascularization decisions in 41.9% of 210 patients at a South Indian tertiary care center.
Observational
No
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging impact clinical diagnosis and management in hospitalized patients with suspected cardiac conditions?
210 consecutive inpatients who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) between January 2021 and December 2023 at a tertiary care center in South India. Majority aged 41-80 years (76%), 61% male.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging
Clinical utility, diagnostic impact, and management implications of CMR (indications, final diagnoses, image quality, and impact on management)
CMR is a robust diagnostic tool that significantly impacts clinical decision-making, altering management in over half of inpatients at an Indian tertiary care center.
Objectives: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an advanced, non-invasive imaging modality with unparalleled accuracy for cardiac structure, function, and tissue characterization. Despite its global recognition, access and utilization remain uneven across regions, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to describe the clinical utility, diagnostic impact, and management implications of CMR at a tertiary care center in South India. Materials and Methods: This retrospective clinical audit analyzed 210 consecutive inpatients who underwent CMR between January 2021 and December 2023. Indications, final diagnoses, image quality, and impact on management were assessed. Results: Majority of the patients were aged 41–80 years, representing 160 (76%) individuals, with a male predominance of 128 (61%). The leading indications for CMR were viability assessment in 118 (56.2%), cardiomyopathy in 65 (31%), and myocarditis in 19 (9.0%) patients. The corresponding final diagnoses were ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)/coronary artery disease in 92 (43.80%) patients and non-ICM, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, in 65 (31%) patients. Image quality was diagnostic in 197 (94%) cine studies and 189 (90%) late gadolinium enhancement studies. CMR findings altered inpatient management through major medication changes in 94 (44.76%) patients and revascularization decisions in 88 (41.9%) patients. In addition, CMR results prompted device therapies in 34 (16.19%) patients and surgical or structural interventions in 18 (8.57%) patients. Anticoagulation therapy was initiated in 25 (11.90%) patients, and immunosuppression or anti-inflammatory therapy was started in 16 (7.62%) patients based on CMR findings. Conclusion: CMR is a robust and safe diagnostic tool with high image quality and significant clinical impact, improving decision-making in over half of the inpatients. This study represents one of the first systematic evaluations of real-world CMR practice from an Indian tertiary care setting, underscoring the need for broader accessibility and registry-based validation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pooja Shridhar Kulkarni
Anupama Hegde
Jahnavi Gaduputi
Indian Journal of Cardiovascular Disease in Women
M.S. Ramaiah Medical College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kulkarni et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Inpatients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at a tertiary care center in South India, predominantly middle-aged and elderly adults with suspected or established cardiac disease (n=210). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Imaging was evaluated on Impact of CMR findings on inpatient management changes including medication, revascularization, device therapy, surgical interventions, anticoagulation, and immunosuppression. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging influenced inpatient management by prompting major medication changes in 44.76% and revascularization decisions in 41.9% of 210 patients at a South Indian tertiary care center.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd3dd48f933b5eed9669 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/ijcdw_75_2025
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: