The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is hampered by a persistent lack of a rigorous, operational definition, leaving the field reliant on aspirational descriptions and narrow behavioral benchmarks. This paper argues that a viable path forward requires moving beyond functional mimicry to a formal structural definition. We propose a framework that defines AGI not by what it can do (i.e., pass a specific test), but by what it is: an integrated cognitive architecture composed of a set of core, non-negotiable properties. We deconstruct general intelligence into its fundamental architectural components: a hybrid reasoning engine supporting logical, intuitive, and simulative cognition; a memory system designed for both long-term knowledge conservation and dynamic adaptation; intrinsic agency enabling autonomous goal-setting and execution; and metacognitive capabilities for self-reflection and continuous improvement. We posit that these properties are not an optional checklist but form an interdependent system where intelligence emerges from their synthesis. This structural approach provides a more robust foundation for the field than existing definitions. It establishes a clear engineering blueprint for constructing AGI, offers a principled methodology for evaluating progress based on architectural milestones rather than task-specific performance, and reframes the discourse from chasing an elusive concept to building a verifiable system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leonid Derikiants
Vasily Mazin
Simulation Technologies (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Derikiants et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e4cd6127c7a504c2236 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18766832
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: