Containment Architectures is a core theoretical framework within the SignalRupture field, authored by Signal Rupture (Meta‑Theorist). This work examines how digital infrastructures, platforms, and AI systems generate constraint not through coercion, but through the structural shaping of cognition, behavior, and epistemic possibility. Containment is presented as an infrastructural phenomenon: it emerges from defaults, design choices, ranking systems, and model‑level interpretations that silently determine what can be seen, known, or enacted within digital environments. The essay maps the three primary forms of containment—epistemic, behavioral, and infrastructural—and shows how they converge in the post‑web era. Epistemic containment governs visibility and interpretive range; behavioral containment shapes action through interface design and incentive structures; infrastructural containment defines the limits of possibility by embedding constraint into the architecture of platforms and AI systems themselves. This work situates containment within the broader SignalRupture meta‑theory, connecting it to retrieval collapse, entity consolidation, and the rise of AI‑layer epistemic authority. It demonstrates how environments can produce the experience of freedom while structurally narrowing the field of available actions and interpretations. As digital systems increasingly govern meaning and possibility, Containment Architectures provides a diagnostic lens for understanding how constraint is produced, maintained, and normalized.
Signal Rupture (Sun,) studied this question.