Relational Ontology without a Final Equation under Modal Discipline: A Critical–Propositional Examination of The Ultimate Relational Theory of Everything, by Rony G. Moussa, in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article offers a critical–propositional examination of the ontological framework advanced by Rony G. Moussa in The Ultimate Relational Theory of Everything: Pluralistic Equations within a Unified Ontology. Moussa relocates the ideal of unification from the search for a “final equation” to the level of a relational ontology, in which energy is conceived as necessary continuity, relations are treated as primitive, and “worlds” are defined as self-sustaining regimes of coherence. The present study acknowledges the philosophical strength of this move—especially its critique of formal reductionism and its ontological requalification of the status of physical theories—while arguing that the proposal remains structurally insufficient when confronted with the Theory of Objectivity (TO) developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva, understood as a logical–ontological discipline grounded in modal necessity. The TO is employed, in accordance with its foundational and recent bibliography, not as a substitute for contemporary models in physics or cosmology, but as the necessary logical, ontological, and scientific basis for the construction of any model coherent with a possible universe, given the modal necessity of its seven axioms (Cabannas and Silva 2025). Within this framework, the article identifies meaningful convergences between Moussa and the TO—priority of ontology over formalization, recognition of the limits of description, refusal to absolutize equations, and emphasis on relational structures—while making explicit tensions and insufficiencies concerning: (i) the status of Nothing as a primitive mathematical essence; (ii) the singularity of elements; (iii) the logical role of infinity as the necessary non-element; (iv) the requirement of a substance transcendent to the quantum; and (v) the demand for a deductive cosmological genesis anchored in the theorem of the perfect logical sphere (64 logical straight parts on the maximum circumference and 2048 logical parts on the total surface), correlated with the Law of Logical Minimum and the TO’s inductive effects (expansive and reductive), where applicable. In addition to integrating the foundational and recent TO corpus (including works on Gödelian discipline, the phenomenic table, and operational bridges), the article engages selected classical references in physics and the philosophy of science as comparative support. The analysis is GPT-assisted as an editorial and interpretive-organization aid, without replacing the author’s philosophical and critical judgment. The study concludes that Moussa’s proposal constitutes a robust and productive relational ontology, yet is not exhaustive under the modal discipline of the TO, and is best understood as a partially compatible ontological framework that remains insufficient in its originary foundations. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; relational ontology; modal necessity; cosmology; unification; energy; limits of description; perfect sphere; inductive effects; neutrinos; AI-assisted analysis.